Search results

Why don't people just go chop wood if they want to chop wood? I'd rather not grind for 6 years

I really don’t think this was anything other than beta content and a reason to play for more than 2 seconds

I voted yes, It’s a little too easy atm

You're misunderstanding a few things about being good at pvp in MO. Being good means that even if you're gifted all of the TC of a guild and 30-40% of their members, being good means losing most of your fights, getting completely routed for a week straight etc, so long as you claim it on the...

I got something you can use with both hands

Kallardian Kallardisk Ah thank god.

I would be for that. I don’t think you should be able to block everyone but maybe you can get 1 or 2 blocks every once in a while. There wasn’t any way that I knew of to prevent someone from rate spamming

I think that is the primary reason they didn't add it. The system was so heavily abused that the admins needed to constantly babysit it, and it is not difficult to layer your disagree spam in a way that seems somewhat legit. I get that its a nice feature to have, but under a totality of...

Points I had. Vulnerable to abuse/destructive Confusion if it’s a rage rating or genuine Unclear what specifically is being disagreed with in a long post Points you had I don’t know how to disagree without actually explaining why Who cares Bias People have no friends Vague disagrees are somehow...

I don’t know what you’re talking about but you’re making very little sense. It is a slight loss I guess in the respect I had for you but I guess we can agree to end this conversation since you’re not making any points and just defaulting to insults mostly.

Also given that you responded to my post with who cares and your op says everyone has no friends this is quite the charge

Fair point. That's a little easier to spot and less destructive. In my personal experience I found the disagree system really didn't add any value, just a tool for 1 or 2 people to abuse the hell out of. Sorry that you're getting upset. Also as Valoran said about this a long time ago. It...

With data its either reliable or it isn't. if half the disagrees are useless information then all of them are.

What's the point of having a system if it does nothing and convey's no useful information other than how salty someone is?

people got super political with it and just disagree spammed people they don't like.

You're way too hung up on the outposts. We basically had that with a few tweaks. Hopefully they do it better this time. This thread isn't even really about that, its about siege windows which i'm against, because I feel its super zerg friendly. Only a fool would say the siege system in MO 1...

The unfortunate truth is we had that system, sieging was basically impossible. Sieges we're resolved by the NPC guards and 2 people with fire arrows half the time. The game was arguably better when defending was too difficult. If people ask SV to make it hard to siege I fear they'll find...

I don’t know why it’s hard to understand that declaring your sieges takes so much sand out of the box.

you talk too much go to forums.

So did they announce that they will attack at this date, this time, and this location or did the army wait to get spotted first? Ambushes never happened? I understand that sieges often involved starving out the castle, that doesn't really relate to what i'm saying about declaring a siege...