Recent content by Taurus

Sure, it just doesn't make any sense. If you have a fantasy world with books and maps already (haven), then why restrict that when it really doesn't have any effect other than being a pain in the ass? There's no upside, it doesn't make exploring more fun or hard, just tedious and annoying.

Doesn't make any sense not to have a map. There's books in-game, meaning the technology to make maps are already in the world, and there's a map online for everyone to just Alt-Tab to. It just makes things frustrating, not hard.

Agree with everything that Magestica brought up. They've stated that they're focusing more on PvE in this sequel, and I really hope the devs take such advice to heart. It will be great by just implementing core mechanics from others RPGs and adding variation to the attacks, and group strategies...

Yeah, I just got a bit worried seeing people thinking that persistence should be somewhere close. I'd be much happier if it's more polished before that, the game has enormous potential! Just read in an interview that they've got content up their sleeves though, tested and ready to roll out, so...

Playing around more, I'm sure we should all calm down. Persistence is far off still, and would be detrimental to the game in the long run if it came anywhere close to the current state.

Was thinking about making a thread stating this, but saw this one. This game should not be in Beta, but in Alpha-testing. There's so much that's incomplete and lacking content, will be waiting at least 6 months before coming back and testing. Happy to help the project, but don't go rushing into...

Everything Weathermore brought up is absolutely great, and the notion several has brought up that persistence is a kind of Early Access and launch whether the developers want to view it as one or not. Don't rush into it, your trusted core of players (from MO1 and new) will be around and wait...