Search results

I sure am.

No

Thank you.

Interesting.

They CAN be completely destroyed, but a strategic option for the attacker (if the intent wasn't to grief the defender) would be to preserve as much of the standing structure as possible to capture. The defender would also be able to sabotage their wall-mounted siege ramparts if they feel it's a...

I think the emphasis on "value" of keeps is what needs work. Keeps need functional, social, and political value. Being able to capture keeps shouldn't devalue them and if it does, I feel keeps themselves don't hold enough value. I do enjoy this discussion!

I don't disagree, Total destruction is unnecessary. Claiming a keep should still be a gold sink, but destroying a portion of a long wall shouldn't destroy the entire thing. For sure.

IIRC, I feel one of the major issues was that structures were tied to guilds. They needed to be destroyed and rebuilt for guild new guild ownership if I recall. For example, you couldn't walk into an empty keep and stake a claim and be able to utilize everything in it.. I feel what needs to...

Iceland :D

What isn’t realistic (what ever realism is in this game) is having to level buildings and rebuild rather than simply capture them and build a new gate or “re-key” doors to obtain ownership. IMO, the only thing that should be bound property of a guild is the keying of the gate/doors for guild...

I think we need it for the sake of new players. I want to MO2 to succeed, not just a world full of pvp vets. New player experience is crucial for longevity. Throwing them to the snakes rather than easing them in will hurt. However, 48 hours then the boot out of haven comes.

Exactly. MO1 sieging was more of a grief mechanic that didn’t belong in a game that people play to enjoy. It griefed the attackers and the defenders, lol.

Similar to, but more intricate than Dark Age of Camelot, capturing keeps and certain structures can be strategic, fun, and rewarding. Ore and I had a good discussion about this, and the ability to capture keeps rather than destroy would make it a more rewarding objective for the attackers, but...

Agree with everything here. Hoping there's more diverse armor combinations besides weight and damage mitigation. I like what they're doing with species, hopefully this diversity translates to other systems and offers more than meta builds.

Yeah, I noticed. Gotta say I'm disappointed with the new changes. I'm hoping to play this as an MMO with quality gameplay, I enjoyed the slower combat, if I wanted fast-paced shit I'd go play Battlefield or something.

Agree. It was also more enjoyable having to choose the right mount for the job. Agree.

For sure! Keeps things interesting and competitive.

Funny post.

Complainers will never last in a full loot game. But, we do need a good balance of players, those who like like to PvP, those who like to PvE, those who like to craft, and those who like a bit of everything. Retention of players who enjoy the game is important, we lost way too many over the...

If players slept at their keyboards and were ready to go 24/7, this could work. But, in a game where people have to sleep while others are just getting the on makes this difficult. It’s already difficult having a guild with multiple time zones. As good as the fantasy of “hardcore leave it up...